Droit de la Famille

Having found that the general meeting

📅 Décision du 16 May 2001⚖️ Cour de cassation

Having found that the general meeting of co-owners which had resolved on façade refurbishment works had given full powers to the building manager (syndic) to identify the co-owners who wished to pay their share of the contribution out of their own means and to seek a loan for the others; that the statement of the debts of the owners' association, representing close to three years of its budget, had been brought to the co-owners' attention at that same meeting; and holding that Article 35 of the Decree of 17 March 1967 allowed the building manager, before placing the order for the works, to call for funds and to have the renovation works carried out only once the necessary funds had been raised, a Court of Appeal was entitled to hold that, while the building manager was not responsible for the owners' association's impecuniosity, he had committed a breach of duty towards the company entrusted with the works, which amounted to a substantial sum, given that, knowing the indebted financial position of that association and having concealed it from the company, he had placed that order without first having secured the necessary funds.

Reference decision: cc • N° 99-19.838 • 2001-05-16 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your family and property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The situation

Having found that the general meeting of co-owners which had resolved on façade refurbishment works had given full powers to the building manager (syndic) to identify the co-owners who wished to pay their share of the contribution out of their own means and to seek a loan for the others; that the statement of the debts of the owners' association, representing close to three years of its budget, had been brought to the co-owners' attention at that same meeting; and holding that Article 35 of the Decree of 17 March 1967 allowed the building manager, before placing the order for the works, to call for funds and to have the renovation works carried out only once the necessary funds had been raised, a Court of Appeal was entitled to hold that, while the building manager was not responsible for the owners' association's impecuniosity, he had committed a breach of duty towards the company entrusted with the works, which amounted to a substantial sum, given that, knowing the indebted financial position of that association and having concealed it from the company, he had placed that order without first having secured the necessary funds.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for bringing an appeal
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, legal instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive legal advice always costs less than a dispute

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €70 with Maître Perucca.

⚖️ Does this apply to you?

Maître Bruno Perucca, French family & estate lawyer, Antibes — available across France (FR/EN/IT).

📞 +33 6 89 73 10 87  |  ⭐ 4.9/5 (304 reviews)

Book 30 min — €70   → Learn more

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 99-19.838
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 16 mai 2001

Mots-clés

droit de la famillejurisprudencefamille
BP

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Bruno Perucca — Avocat au Barreau de Grasse, Docteur en Droit, spécialisé en droit de la famille et du patrimoine. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par Maître Bruno Perucca.

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Articles similaires en Droit de la Famille

Voir tout →

Explorez plus d'analyses juridiques en droit de la famille

Tous les articles Droit de la Famille
★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Bruno Perucca, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse sous 24h

Continuer votre lecture

Après avoir estimé qu'on ne pouvait