Droit de la Famille

Having held that one could not

📅 Décision du 15 December 1982⚖️ Cour de cassation

Having held that the purchaser of a second-hand vehicle could not seriously be reproached for having awaited the final determination of the criminal prosecution for fraud as to the qualities of the thing sold, brought against him in his capacity as reseller, before bringing an action for warranty against latent defects against the seller, the Court of Appeal merely exercised its sovereign power of assessment as to the length of the short period allowed by Article 1648 of the French Civil Code in declaring that action admissible, it having been brought two years and five months after the settlement.

Reference decision: Court of Cassation • No. 81-15.751 • 1982-12-15 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your family and property rights. Here is what it means for you.

The situation

Having held that the purchaser of a second-hand vehicle could not seriously be reproached for having awaited the final determination of the criminal prosecution for fraud as to the qualities of the thing sold, brought against him in his capacity as reseller, before bringing an action for warranty against latent defects against the seller, the Court of Appeal merely exercised its sovereign power of assessment as to the length of the short period allowed by Article 1648 of the French Civil Code in declaring that action admissible, it having been brought two years and five months after the settlement.

What the law says

This decision confirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for bringing claims
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, legal instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive advice always costs less than a dispute

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €70 with Maître Perucca.

⚖️ Does this apply to you?

Maître Bruno Perucca, French family & estate lawyer, Antibes — available across France (FR/EN/IT).

📞 +33 6 89 73 10 87  |  ⭐ 4.9/5 (304 reviews)

Book 30 min — €70   → Learn more

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 81-15.751
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 15 décembre 1982

Mots-clés

droit de la famillejurisprudencefamille
BP

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Bruno Perucca — Avocat au Barreau de Grasse, Docteur en Droit, spécialisé en droit de la famille et du patrimoine. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par Maître Bruno Perucca.

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Bruno Perucca, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse sous 24h

Continuer votre lecture

En se déclarant incompétent en raison