Same-Sex Adoption: Bordeaux Court Confirms Right to Filiation

In Guipavas, Finistère, as elsewhere in France, can a same-sex couple adopt a child? This question, for a long time a source of uncertainty, has just received a clear answer. The Bordeaux Court of Appeal, in a judgment of 12 November 2024, confirmed that marriage is not a barrier to adoption for same-sex couples. A decision that reassures Marie and Sophie, or Paul and Jean, who are considering starting a family through adoption.

This case, simple on the surface, nevertheless required a long judicial process. The first instance court refused the adoption, considering that the child's best interests were not sufficiently demonstrated. But the appeal court overturned this decision, affirming that the sexual orientation of the parents is not a relevant criterion for assessing their ability to raise a child.

What does this judgment mean for you? If you are a married same-sex couple and wish to adopt, this decision strengthens your right to start a family. It also reminds us that judges must focus on the best interests of the child, not on prejudice. But be careful: each case remains individual. Here is a detailed analysis of the decision and its practical implications.

The Facts: A Story Like Many Others

Mr and Mrs X – let's call them David and Yann – are a married same-sex couple since 2018. They live in Guipavas, Finistère, and wish to adopt a three-year-old child placed in a children's home run by the child welfare services in Landerneau. After several months of preparation, the family council authorised the procedure. But at first instance, the court refused the adoption, finding that the two men would not provide sufficient 'emotional stability', without proving this assertion.

The couple, supported by their lawyer, decided to appeal. Before the Bordeaux Court of Appeal, their lawyers argued that sexual orientation is not a lawful ground for refusal. They relied on Article 343-1 of the Civil Code, which allows 'a married couple or any person over 28 years of age' to adopt, without distinction of sex or sexual orientation. The court, after examination, set aside the judgment and granted full adoption.

A twist: the prosecution had supported the initial refusal, but the court considered its arguments 'insufficiently substantiated'. This case perfectly illustrates the daily struggle of many same-sex couples to have their right to parenthood recognised.

The Court's Reasoning — Analysed

To understand the judgment, we must return to the legal foundations. Full adoption (which severs all ties with the family of origin) is governed by Articles 343-1 and following of the Civil Code. The text imposes two conditions: the adopter must be over 26 (or 28 if a couple) and must have the consent of the biological parents or a declaration of abandonment. Here, these conditions were met.

The question was therefore whether the couple's sexual orientation could constitute an obstacle. The court answered in the negative, relying on two principles: the best interests of the child (enshrined in the International Convention on the Rights of the Child) and the principle of non-discrimination. It recalls that the child's best interest is to be raised by persons capable of providing a stable and loving environment, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation.

The court also rejected the argument of a risk of 'identification confusion', often advanced by opponents of same-sex parenting. It cited psychological studies showing that children raised by same-sex couples do not show significant differences in their development. Finally, the court emphasised that the legislature, by opening marriage to same-sex couples in 2013, implicitly recognised their ability to start a family.

This judgment confirms a trend already begun by the Court of Cassation in 2023 (Civ. 1st, 4 October 2023, No. 22-40.098). It is therefore not a reversal, but a consistent application of existing principles. The Bordeaux judges simply decided a specific case by setting aside prejudice.

What This Means for You — Practically

This decision has immediate practical implications for several profiles. If you are a married same-sex couple wishing to adopt: you can now rely on this judgment to challenge a refusal. Courts will have to justify their decision based on the best interests of the child and not your sexual orientation. For example, in Landerneau, another couple could have their case examined more favourably thanks to this precedent.

If you are a biological parent consenting to the adoption of your child by a same-sex couple: you should be informed that this consent is valid and that the adopting couple benefits from enhanced legal protection. The child will acquire adoptive filiation as in any classic adoption.

For child welfare professionals (social workers, family court judges): this decision reminds us of the importance of individual assessment. A refusal based on sexual orientation would be contrary to the law and would expose you to legal challenges. In practice, procedural timeframes may be reduced if the file is well prepared: allow 6 to 12 months for a simple adoption, a little longer for a full adoption.

Finally, for unmarried same-sex couples: marriage remains a prerequisite for joint adoption. But this judgment could influence debates on the recognition of unmarried same-sex families.

Four Tips to Avoid This Type of Dispute

• Anticipate and prepare your file: Gather all necessary documents (adoption project, social inquiry, psychological reports). A complete file reduces the risk of refusal.
• Seek a solicitor specialising in family law: The adoption procedure is complex. A professional knows the legal arguments that have succeeded in similar cases, such as the Bordeaux case.
• Prefer full adoption if possible: It provides more stable filiation and is often less contested than simple adoption (which retains certain ties with the family of origin).
• Keep informed of current laws: The Law of 21 February 2022 expanded access to adoption for married couples, but certain nuances persist. Follow legal news.
• Do not hesitate to appeal: In case of refusal, remedies exist. The Bordeaux case shows that appeal courts can correct discriminatory decisions.

Further Reading: Related Case Law and Developments

This judgment is part of a line of decisions favourable to same-sex parenting. In 2023, the Court of Cassation already ruled that a refusal of adoption based on the sexual orientation of the parent was discriminatory (Civ. 1st, 4 October 2023). A few months earlier, the Paris Court of Appeal authorised adoption by a woman in a relationship with another woman, in the absence of a biological link (CA Paris, 8 February 2023).

The trend is therefore clear: French courts are aligning their case law with the republican values of equality and non-discrimination. However, resistance persists in some jurisdictions, particularly in the provinces. The Bordeaux judgment could help standardise practices. For the future, we can expect similar decisions on the recognition of filiation in cases of medically assisted reproduction abroad.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can my same-sex partner and I adopt a child? Yes, if you are married and meet the age conditions (26 years minimum) and capacity. Sexual orientation is no longer an obstacle.
2. What are the timeframes for an adoption? Allow 6 to 12 months for a simple adoption, 12 to 18 months for a full adoption. These timeframes may vary depending on the court.
3. What if the administration refuses our file? You can challenge the refusal before the judicial court, then on appeal. The Bordeaux judgment is a useful precedent for your argument.
4. Do we need to be married to adopt jointly? Yes. Joint adoption is reserved for married couples, regardless of their sexual orientation.
5. Can the child maintain a connection with their biological parents? In full adoption, no. In simple adoption, yes, a link may be maintained if it is in the child's best interests.

In a similar situation? A 30-minute initial consultation with Maître Perucca (£45) can save you months of litigation — and often much more. Book an appointment →