Droit de la Famille

Service of Court Documents between Lawyers: Strict Compliance with Articles 672 and 673 of the French Code of Civil Procedure

📅 Décision du 02 July 2020⚖️ Cour de cassation

Under Article 672 of the code de procédure civile (French Code of Civil Procedure), the service of court documents between lawyers is evidenced by the affixing of the seal and signature of the judicial officer (huissier de justice) on the document and its copy, together with an indication of the date and the name of the receiving lawyer. Under Article 673 of the same code, direct notification of court documents between lawyers is effected by delivery of the document in duplicate to the receiving lawyer, who immediately returns one of the copies to their fellow counsel after dating and endorsing it. A court of appeal violates these provisions where it rules without any debate on the basis of pleadings bearing a printed statement that they had been served on the lawyer instructed by the opposing party (judgment No. 1, appeal No. 19-12.752), or on which a stamp of the bar association of a local bar attesting to their service had been affixed and which bore the signature of the lawyer who filed the pleadings (judgment No. 2, appeal No. 19-12.753), without verifying that those pleadings had been served in the required form and that the opposing party had been given the opportunity to respond.

Reference decision: cc • No. 19-12.753 • 2020-07-02 • View the decision →

This decision provides important insight into your family and property rights. Here is what it changes for you.

The background

Under Article 672 of the code de procédure civile (French Code of Civil Procedure), the service of court documents between lawyers is evidenced by the affixing of the seal and signature of the judicial officer (huissier de justice) on the document and its copy, together with an indication of the date and the name of the receiving lawyer. Under Article 673 of the same code, direct notification of court documents between lawyers is effected by delivery of the document in duplicate to the receiving lawyer, who immediately returns one of the copies to their fellow counsel after dating and endorsing it. A court of appeal violates these provisions where it rules without any debate on the basis of pleadings bearing a printed statement that they had been served on the lawyer instructed by the opposing party (judgment No. 1, appeal No. 19-12.752), or on which a stamp of the bar association of a local bar attesting to their service had been affixed and which bore the signature of the lawyer who filed the pleadings (judgment No. 2, appeal No. 19-12.753), without verifying that those pleadings had been served in the required form and that the opposing party had been given the opportunity to respond

What the law says

This decision reaffirms the fundamental principles of property law.

Key points to remember

  • Strictly observe the statutory time limits for appeals
  • Keep all your supporting documents (title deeds, legal instruments, correspondence)
  • Plan ahead: preventive legal advice is always less costly than litigation

For an analysis of your situation: 30-minute consultation at €70 with Maître Perucca.

⚖️ Does this apply to you?

Maître Bruno Perucca, French family & estate lawyer, Antibes — available across France (FR/EN/IT).

📞 +33 6 89 73 10 87  |  ⭐ 4.9/5 (304 reviews)

Book 30 min — €70   → Learn more

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: 19-12.753
  • Juridiction: Cour de cassation
  • Date de décision: 02 juillet 2020

Mots-clés

droit de la famillejurisprudencefamille
BP

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Bruno Perucca — Avocat au Barreau de Grasse, Docteur en Droit, spécialisé en droit de la famille et du patrimoine. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par Maître Bruno Perucca.

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

★★★★★4.9/5 — Avis Google

Maître Bruno Perucca, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45

🔒 Confidentiel • Sans engagement • Réponse sous 24h

Continuer votre lecture