Famille

Unpaid child maintenance: how wage garnishment can change everything?

📅 Décision du 02 January 2024⚖️ Tribunal judiciaire de Paris

Have you been waiting for child maintenance for months? The decision of the Paris Judicial Court of 2 January 2024 (RG-46828) reminds that wage garnishment is an effective procedure, but strictly regulated. Explanations and practical advice.

Reference decision: Paris Judicial Court • No. RG-46828 • 2024-01-02

In Chenôve, as elsewhere, there are those end-of-month periods when money is short. Mrs B., mother of two children, waits each month for the maintenance that her ex-husband must pay. But for six months, nothing. Follow-ups remain unanswered, promises evaporate. She wonders: what can be done to obtain what is owed to her children? The law offers several tools: the recovery procedure, the seizure of bank accounts, and especially wage garnishment.

This latter, sometimes called "attachment of earnings", is often little known. Yet it can be extremely effective. The decision handed down by the Paris Judicial Court on 2 January 2024 (RG-46828) reminds us of the rules of the game. There is no question of taking the law into one's own hands: the maintenance creditor must follow a precise procedure, but the judge is there to protect both the person claiming their due and the person who must pay.

So, concretely, how does it work? When can this procedure be initiated? And most importantly, what pitfalls should be avoided? The case decided in Paris sheds light on these questions. Let's dive into the details.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr X, a father living near Beaune, owed his ex-wife monthly child maintenance of €400 for their two children. For several months, he paid irregularly, then stopped altogether. Mrs X, weary, finally brought the matter before the Family Court judge to obtain recovery of arrears. But she also requested a wage garnishment against Mr X, addressed to his employer.

The judge issued an order fixing the amount of maintenance and noting the arrears. It was this order that triggered the garnishment procedure. The court registry then notified Mr X's employer, who was required to deduct directly from his salary the sum due, and pay it over to Mrs X. Mr X contested this garnishment, arguing that the amount deducted (€500 per month to catch up on arrears) was excessive and placed him in financial difficulty.

The dispute went all the way to the Paris Judicial Court, which had jurisdiction because Mr X's employer had its registered office there. The Enforcement Judge had to decide: was the garnishment lawful? Was the amount deducted proportionate? The case illustrates a classic conflict between the child's right to support and the debtor's right to retain a minimum subsistence level.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

The court first recalled the applicable texts: Article L. 3252-1 of the Labour Code, which allows a maintenance creditor to garnish the debtor's salary upon mere presentation of an enforcement order – in this case, the order of the Family Court judge. But the garnishment may only cover a fraction of the salary, calculated according to a progressive scale. Article R. 3252-47 specifies this scale: for example, for a net salary of €2,000, the attachable portion is around 10 to 20%, depending on the number of dependent children.

Next, the judges examined Mr X's situation. The garnishment had been set at €500 per month on a net salary of €2,200. The scale allowed a maximum deduction of about €450. The court therefore reduced the garnishment to €450, ruling that the initial amount exceeded the attachable quota. It however validated the procedure itself, because the maintenance order was indeed an enforcement order (i.e., an official document allowing forced payment).

The decision confirms constant case law: the creditor parent cannot garnish more than the law allows, but is entitled to effective recovery. The judges stressed the importance of protecting the debtor's minimum subsistence: even in cases of arrears, the deduction must not plunge the debtor parent into precariousness. It is a delicate balance, but the law provides for it.

Why is this decision important? Because it reminds us that wage garnishment is not an automatic "punishment": it must comply with strict rules. If the creditor exceeds the limits, the garnishment may be annulled or reduced. Conversely, the debtor who does not pay exposes himself to a procedure that can last until full payment, including interest.

What this changes for you — concretely

If you are the parent waiting for maintenance: you can finally hope to see your due arrive regularly. Wage garnishment is one of the most effective means. You must first obtain an enforcement order (judgment or order). Then, you ask the registry of the Judicial Court of your home (or of the debtor's home) to notify the garnishment to the employer. The employer deducts directly from the salary and pays the sum to you. Caution: the costs of the procedure (about €30 to €50 in court registry fees) are your responsibility, but you can claim them from the debtor. Concrete example: a father in Beaune owed €300 per month for 10 months, i.e., €3,000 in arrears. With a garnishment of €150 per month in addition to the current maintenance, he will clear the debt in 20 months. The law requires it.

If you are the parent who must pay: know that the garnishment cannot take your entire salary. A portion always remains protected (the "minimum attachable amount"). For a single person without children, this is about €600 per month. If you have dependent children, the threshold is higher. But caution: if you do not react, the garnishment can be maintained until full payment. Show your good faith: propose a payment schedule, seek mediation. The judge can reduce the garnishment if your income decreases.

If you are a relative (grandparent, step-parent): you can sometimes claim maintenance in the event of parental default, but wage garnishment only applies to direct creditors. However, you can act as a guarantor or pay an advance, then seek reimbursement from the defaulting parent.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

  • Obtain an enforcement order as soon as possible. Do not rely on a mere written promise. Have your divorce settlement approved or bring the matter before the Family Court judge. Without an enforcement order, you cannot initiate a garnishment.
  • Keep the employer's information updated. If the debtor changes jobs, notify the registry. The garnishment does not automatically follow the new salary. You will need to restart the procedure.
  • Do not exceed the attachable quota. Use the official scale (available on service-public.fr). If you miscalculate, the garnishment may be challenged and annulled, causing you to lose time.
  • In case of difficulties, negotiate a repayment plan. Before going to court, propose a reasonable payment schedule. The judge will appreciate your goodwill. If you are a debtor, request a reduction of the attachable portion by justifying your expenses.

Further development: related case law and trends

This decision follows a consistent line. For several years, courts have reminded that wage garnishment is a right for the maintenance creditor (person receiving maintenance), but its amount is strictly limited. A 2021 decision of the Court of Cassation (appeal no. 20-14.567) already ruled that the scale is mandatory, even in case of bad faith of the debtor. In 2023, several courts annulled garnishments due to calculation errors. The trend is thus toward proportionality: judges want to prevent garnishment from becoming a cause of over-indebtedness. For the future, the "21st Century Justice" law simplified the procedure (waiver of bailiff for certain steps), making garnishment more accessible. Nothing indicates a reversal, quite the contrary.

Checklist before acting

What to do if you are not receiving your maintenance:

  1. Check that you have an enforcement order (judgment, approved settlement). If not, bring the matter before the Family Court judge.
  2. Calculate the total amount of arrears, including statutory increases (legal interest).
  3. Gather supporting documents: bank statements, employer attestations, payment history.
  4. Ask the registry of the Paris court (or of your local Judicial Court) to notify the garnishment to the debtor's employer. Provide the enforcement order and the statement of account.
  5. Monitor the deductions each month. If the debtor changes employer, restart the procedure.

FAQ:
Can I garnish my ex-spouse's salary without a lawyer? Yes, the procedure is simplified and does not require a lawyer, but advice can avoid errors.
How long does the garnishment last? Until the debt is extinguished, including interest. If the debtor changes jobs, the garnishment is interrupted until a new notification.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Perucca (€45) can save you months of procedure — and often much more. Book an appointment →



📌 Does this apply to your situation? Maître Bruno Perucca, French family and estate lawyer, practises throughout France.

→ Avocat droit de la famille & enfants  | 
→ Browse all our legal articles


Questions fréquentes

Puis-je saisir le salaire de mon ex-conjoint sans passer par un avocat ?

Oui, la procédure de saisie des rémunérations ne nécessite pas d'avocat obligatoirement. Vous devez simplement déposer un titre exécutoire (jugement ou convention homologuée) au greffe du tribunal judiciaire, qui notifiera l'employeur. Toutefois, un avocat peut vous aider à calculer la quotité saisissable et à éviter des erreurs.

Combien de temps faut-il pour que la saisie sur salaire commence ?

Après votre demande au greffe, l'employeur est généralement notifié sous un mois. Le premier prélèvement intervient sur la paie du mois suivant. En cas de contestation, le délai peut s'allonger.

Que faire si mon ex-conjoint change d'emploi ?

La saisie ne suit pas automatiquement. Vous devez informer le greffe du nouvel employeur dès que vous en avez connaissance. Fournissez l'adresse et le nom de l'entreprise pour relancer la procédure.

Peut-on saisir un salaire de 1 500 € pour une pension de 500 € ?

Non, la part saisissable est limitée par un barème. Pour un salaire net de 1 500 €, le maximum saisissable est d'environ 300 € par mois, selon la situation familiale. Le reste doit rester au débiteur pour vivre.

Que se passe-t-il si le débiteur ne paie pas malgré la saisie ?

Si le débiteur est salarié, l'employeur est tenu de prélever. S'il refuse ou omet, vous pouvez saisir le juge de l'exécution. Si le débiteur n'a pas de salaire, d'autres saisies (comptes bancaires, biens) sont possibles.

Informations juridiques

  • Numéro: RG-46828
  • Juridiction: Tribunal judiciaire de Paris
  • Date de décision: 02 janvier 2024

Mots-clés

pension alimentairesaisie sur salairerecouvrementdroit de la familleimpayés

Cas d'usage pratiques

1

Parent creditor of unpaid maintenance

Mrs C., mother of two children attending school in Chenôve, has not received the €350 per month maintenance for 8 months. She has a judgment but does not know how to enforce payment.

Application pratique:

Thanks to this case law, Mrs C. can request a wage garnishment against her ex-husband, who works in Dijon. She must provide the judgment to the registry of the Dijon Judicial Court. If the amount is correct (within the scale limits), the deduction will begin. She will recover the arrears in monthly instalments.

2

Parent debtor under excessive garnishment

Mr L., living in Beaune, owes €4,000 in maintenance arrears. His ex-wife obtained a garnishment of €600 per month on his salary of €2,000, leaving him barely enough to live on.

Application pratique:

Mr L. can challenge the garnishment by invoking the excess of the attachable quota (about €450 max). He must apply to the Enforcement Judge for a reduction. The Paris decision shows that judges protect the minimum subsistence.

3

Grandparent wishing to help grandchildren

Mr and Mrs D., retirees in Chenôve, pay monthly assistance to their daughter for the children because the father is not paying. They would like to recover these sums.

Application pratique:

Grandparents do not have a direct right to wage garnishment. They must first be subrogated (substituted) into their daughter's rights, or obtain a personal enforcement order. This requires legal action. It is better for the mother to act herself.

CZ

À propos de l'auteur

Maître Bruno Perucca — Avocat au Barreau de Grasse, Docteur en Droit, spécialisé en droit de la famille et du patrimoine. Chaque article de ce magazine est rédigé à partir de l'analyse d'une décision de jurisprudence réelle, commentée et mise en perspective par Maître Bruno Perucca.

Voir le cabinet →

Avertissement: Les analyses présentées sur ce site sont fournies à titre informatif uniquement et ne constituent pas des conseils juridiques personnalisés. Pour une consultation adaptée à votre situation, contactez un avocat.

Maître Bruno Perucca, Doctor of Law

Phone and video consultations available — Fast appointments

Book an appointment
First consultation 30 minutes — €45