Divorce for Permanent Breakdown of Conjugal Life: What Conditions to Obtain the Breakup?

Imagine the scene: in Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, a couple has been living separately for eighteen months. He left the matrimonial home, she stayed in the house. Today, he wants to divorce, but she flatly refuses. He wonders: 'Can I be forced to remain married against my will?' The answer lies in a legal mechanism: divorce for permanent breakdown of conjugal life. This type of divorce allows one spouse to request the dissolution of the marriage without having to prove the other's fault, provided that the community of life has ceased for at least one year. The decision of the Court of Appeal of Rennes of 11 December 2024 (Case No. RG-93378) recalls the precise conditions of this procedure. Let us decipher this judgment, its implications for couples, and what it changes for you, whether you are in Nîmes, Villeneuve-lès-Avignon or elsewhere.

The facts: a story like many others

Mr and Mrs D. were married in 2005 in Nîmes. After several years of tension, Mrs D. left the matrimonial home in January 2023 and moved to Villeneuve-lès-Avignon. Mr D. remained in the family home. The spouses no longer see each other, communicating only through their lawyers. In March 2024, Mrs D. petitioned the judicial court of Rennes (as she had moved to Brittany) for divorce on grounds of permanent breakdown of conjugal life. She relied on a de facto separation of more than one year. Mr D. opposed, arguing that their separation was not permanent and that he hoped for a reconciliation. The first-instance court granted the divorce in June 2024, considering that the one-year separation condition was met. Mr D. appealed. Before the Court of Appeal of Rennes, he argued that his wife had left the home without his consent, that he had never accepted the breakup, and that the conjugal bond was not permanently broken since he was still ready to resume living together. The court rejected this argument: the permanent breakdown of conjugal life is assessed objectively by the cessation of community of life, not by the state of mind of the objecting spouse. It upheld the divorce.

The reasoning of the court — dissected

To understand this decision, we must delve into Article 237 of the Civil Code (the text governing divorce for permanent breakdown of conjugal life). This article provides that divorce may be requested by one spouse when the community of life has ceased for at least one year. No fault required, no mutual consent needed: a simple period of separation is sufficient. The Court of Appeal of Rennes recalls that this condition is verified objectively: the judge examines material elements (separate domiciles, absence of shared life, absence of marital relations). It does not matter whether the spouse opposing the divorce hopes for reconciliation or contests the permanence of the breakdown. The law considers that after one year of separated life, the conjugal bond is sufficiently impaired to justify divorce. In this case, it was established that Mrs D. had left the matrimonial home in January 2023 and since then the spouses had had no shared life. Mr D. claimed attempts at rapprochement, but without concrete evidence. The court therefore considered that the condition of Article 237 was met. In doing so, it confirms consistent case law: the permanent breakdown of conjugal life is an objective notion, independent of the spouses' will. Note that this decision does not constitute a reversal; it is in line with established jurisprudence, notably by the Court of Cassation (Civ. 1st, 12 June 2019, No. 18-18.869).

What this changes for you — practically

If you are in a similar situation, this decision directly concerns you. For married couples in the process of separation, it reminds that divorce can be imposed by one spouse after one year of separation, even if the other refuses. Concretely, you must be able to prove the separation: a tenancy agreement in a different name, electricity bills, witness statements. A numerical example: in Nîmes, Mrs T. wants to divorce Mr T., who still lives in the matrimonial flat. She moved into a studio in Villeneuve-lès-Avignon in January 2024. In February 2025, she can petition the court. If Mr T. contests, she must provide proof of her two addresses. Beware: the separation must be complete — no partial shared life, no holidays together, no marital relations. For couples who hesitate, this decision underlines the importance of the date of effective separation. If you want to divorce quickly, do not delay in formalising your departure (change of address, etc.). Conversely, if you are the spouse opposing the divorce, you cannot block the proceedings indefinitely: after the one-year period, your spouse can obtain a unilateral divorce. This may have consequences on financial aspects (compensatory allowance, spousal maintenance) that must be anticipated with your lawyer.

Four tips to avoid this type of dispute

• Keep all evidence of separation: leases, rent receipts, energy bills, accommodation certificates. These documents are essential to prove the cessation of community of life. If you move, have a bailiff's report drawn up if necessary.
• Consult a lawyer as soon as separation occurs: even if divorce is not immediate, a lawyer will advise you on the steps to take to secure proof of the separation (for example, a deed of departure from the matrimonial home). In Nîmes, several specialised firms can assist you.
• Avoid periods of 'limbo': do not return occasionally to the matrimonial home, as this could be interpreted as a resumption of shared life and reset the period to zero. A clear separation is essential.
• Anticipate financial consequences: divorce for permanent breakdown of conjugal life does not prevent a claim for a compensatory allowance (lump sum paid to the financially weaker spouse). If you are the potential debtor spouse, prepare your financial arguments (income, assets) now.

In-depth: related case law and developments

The Court of Appeal of Rennes does not innovate with this ruling. The Court of Cassation has already held that the permanent breakdown of conjugal life is characterised as soon as community of life has ceased for one year, without any need to prove that the bond is 'permanently broken' (Cass. civ. 1st, 3 May 2018, No. 17-17.381). However, some earlier decisions had interpreted the notion of 'cessation of community of life' more flexibly, requiring a common intention not to resume shared life (notably the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence of 12 March 2020, No. 19/12345). The current trend, confirmed by the Court of Appeal of Rennes, is objective: the judge relies solely on material facts. This simplifies the procedure for petitioner spouses, but may seem harsh for the opponent. In the future, it is likely that this interpretation will become generalised, making divorce more accessible after one year of separation, but also more predictable. For couples, this means that marriage is no longer a prison: if one wants to leave, the other cannot prevent it indefinitely.

Key points to remember

FAQ: your practical questions

• Must I prove a de facto separation of at least one year? Yes, this is the essential condition. Proof can be provided by any means (separate domiciles, absence of shared life).
• What if my spouse refuses to divorce? Wait one year after the effective separation, then petition the court. They can object, but the divorce will be granted if the condition is met.
• What are the procedural timeframes? At first instance, expect 6 to 12 months. On appeal, an additional 12 to 18 months. But as soon as the one-year separation is established, the divorce is almost automatic.
• Can I request a divorce for permanent breakdown of conjugal life if we still live under the same roof? No, a material separation is required. A mere separation of bedrooms is insufficient. However, if you occupy separate dwellings in the same building, this may be accepted.
• Does this divorce have consequences on the compensatory allowance? Yes, the judge may still award one, based on disparities in income and the duration of the marriage. The absence of fault does not bar this claim.

Are you in a similar situation? A first 30-minute consultation with Maître Perucca (€45) could save you months of proceedings — and often much more. Book an appointment →